Bolhouse, Vander Hulst, Risko, Baar & Lefere Located in the historic Grandville State Bank Building Grandville State Bank Building

Articles

previous page

CPAs BOUND BY LAW TO KEEP CLIENTS’ INFORMATION CONFIDENTIAL

Author: Jeannine L. Bolhouse
Date: 01/12/2010

In Michigan, accountants have a duty to keep their clients’ financial information confidential. Michigan law states:
Except by written permission of the client…to whom the information pertains [a CPA] shall not disclose or divulge and shall not be required to disclose or divulge information…that the [CPA]…was employed to make….information derived from or as a result of professional service rendered by a [CPA] is confidential and privileged.
If you are a CPA, you are required to obtain written permission before producing information gained in the course of an engagement, regardless of your client’s previous conduct. This is true even if you are served a court issued subpoena to produce privileged information. Without your client’s written permission, your only course of action is to appear as the subpoena requires, but decline to produce records or give testimony. On the other hand, a court can compel your client to disclose information within your custody. While the information is privileged in the hands of a CPA, it is not privileged in the hands of the client.
There are two notable exceptions to the CPA’s privilege. First, if the clients are a husband and wife who file joint tax returns or the client is an entity owned 50-50 by two people, both of whom were actively involved and worked with the CPA, then neither individual can invoke the CPA’s privilege against the other. The CPA would be required to comply with a subpoena in a lawsuit involving the two clients, such as a divorce action.
The second exception is the called the “crime-fraud exception.” If otherwise privileged information constitutes evidence of a present, ongoing crime or an act of criminal fraud, a court may hold that the CPA privilege does not apply. However, a CPA’s information regarding past misconduct is still covered by privilege.
Finally, it is important to keep in mind that this is a Michigan statute and may not be applicable in federal court or federal matters such as a dispute with the IRS.
Every situation presents a unique set of circumstances and it may not be clear when a CPA is allowed to disclose and/or withhold information. Contact our office if you have questions.

Send this page

  

Printer friendly

back to top